Initial notes about Aruna roy's draft.

Read the comparison table. notes below. Will update after reading the draft(s)

• Aruna's comparison table is silent on
  
• The transparency of operation
• Citizen's charter. Time bound delivery of services failing which it can be treated as a corrupt practise.
  


• Multiple independent organisation instead of one single organisation
• Who will co-ordinate between the organization.
• Why cannot they be departments under a single organization. It will be easier to move people around depending on the backlog.
  
• How will the mining scam be handled in such an organization (People from all hierarchies of the government are involved)
• Point #2 about jan lokpal in her comparison table is incorrect. refer to Chapter VII in the jan lokpal draft for knowing why the PM is more equal than others.
• Horse trading and other note for vote schemes not covered in Aruna's draft.
• Aruna's Selection committee is weak 3 member (PM, Leader of Opposition and One SC Judge nominated by CJI)
• Janlokpal also includes additional SC Judge 2 HC Judge, CEC, CAG, All previous Lokpal chief.
• Aruna's method of complaining against lokpal members is weak SC is the only option.
• Jan lokpal has Chairman of Lokayukta, Human rights commission , CJ High court , 2 retired civil servents and 2 members of civil society under chairmanship of Retired high court judge evaluating the complaint.
• Chairman of janlokpal is covered by SC.